Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
How Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. stacks up
RHP · against 103 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
50/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #48 of 104 · scores higher than 51% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score20 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including RHP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 50?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.A mix: stronger EBITDA yield, but weaker free cash flow yield and earnings yield than most Real Estate peers.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 75% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 2.9% vs peer median 6.5%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 64% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.2% vs peer median 5.3%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 69% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.9% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RHP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RHP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 106 reported | 3.0% | 4.5% | 30% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 100 reported | 6.5% | 5.5% | 79% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 61 reported | 2.9% | 5.1% | 22% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 106 reported | 8.8% | 63.5% | 1% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RHP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.10T JPY (≈$7.5B) | 90 | 82 | |
| 2 | 10.1B USD | 87 | 53 | |
| 3 | 880.1B JPY (≈$6.0B) | 84 | 64 | |
| 3 | 135.9B MXN (≈$7.3B) | 84 | 76 | |
| 5 | 4.8B USD | 81 | 52 | |
| 45 | 9.1B USD | 51 | 38 | |
| 48 | 6.3B EUR (≈$6.9B) | 50 | 52 | |
| 48 | 6.2B USD | 50 | 63 | |
| 48 | 609.8B INR (≈$7.3B) | 50 | 78 | |
| 48 | 9.4B USD | 50 | 51 | |
| 52 | 57.1B SEK (≈$5.7B) | 49 | 50 | |
| 53 | 14.0B USD | 48 | 40 | |
| 54 | 12.9B USD | 47 | 55 | |
| 54 | 56.7B SEK (≈$5.7B) | 47 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score