Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
RHP · against 105 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Ranked #104 of 106 · scores higher than 2% of peers · safety percentile 3
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)10 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including RHP · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | RHP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 106 reported | 3.35× | 0.83× | 5% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 105 reported | 1.19 | 0.86 | 15% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 102 reported | 1.31× | 0.81× | 62% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 60.5B HKD (≈$7.7B) | 94 | 54 | |
| 3 | 609.8B INR (≈$7.3B) | 90 | 78 | |
| 4 | 11.7B USD | 89 | 80 | |
| 5 | 8.7B USD | 89 | 77 | |
| 100 | 10.8B CAD (≈$7.9B) | 7 | 40 | |
| 101 | 15.9B USD | 5 | 49 | |
| 102 | 5.1B USD | 4 | 23 | |
| 103 | 5.7B USD | 4 | 56 | |
| 104 | 9.4B USD | 3 | 51 | |
| 105 | 13.7B USD | 2 | 70 | |
| 106 | 10.1B USD | 1 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score