Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
REXR · against 111 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Ranked #71 of 112 · scores higher than 37% of peers · safety percentile 30
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)19 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including REXR · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | REXR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 112 reported | 0.41× | 0.83× | 86% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 111 reported | 1.20 | 0.87 | 13% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 108 reported | 0.34× | 0.80× | 24% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 60.5B HKD (≈$7.7B) | 94 | 54 | |
| 3 | 609.8B INR (≈$7.3B) | 90 | 78 | |
| 4 | 11.7B USD | 89 | 80 | |
| 5 | 8.7B USD | 89 | 77 | |
| 67 | 5.2B USD | 33 | 54 | |
| 68 | 6.0B EUR (≈$6.6B) | 33 | 32 | |
| 69 | 10.3B EUR (≈$11.3B) | 31 | 57 | |
| 70 | 19.1B AUD (≈$12.6B) | 31 | 56 | |
| 71 | 8.8B USD | 30 | 28 | |
| 72 | 15.7B USD | 29 | 48 | |
| 73 | 5.0B GBP (≈$6.5B) | 28 | 40 | |
| 74 | 4.6B USD | 28 | 57 | |
| 75 | 4.4B GBP (≈$5.7B) | 28 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score