Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to RPC, Inc.
How RPC, Inc. stacks up
RES · against 385 other Energy companies
Growth
53/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #181 of 386 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score39 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including RES · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 53?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.A mix: stronger revenue growth, but weaker earnings per share growth than most Energy peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 87% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -57.7% vs peer median 1.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: -0.8% vs peer median -1.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 89% of peers. Revenue growth: 25.4% vs peer median 0.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RES, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RES | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 394 reported | 25.4% | 0.5% | 89% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 292 reported | -57.7% | 1.0% | 13% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 383 reported | -0.8% | -1.3% | 53% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RES| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 203M MYR (≈$45M) | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 4.3B GBP (≈$5.6B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 254M USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 177 | 344M USD | 54 | 28 | |
| 177 | 7.3B USD | 54 | 43 | |
| 181 | 66.2B HKD (≈$8.5B) | 53 | 68 | |
| 181 | 19.2B CAD (≈$14.0B) | 53 | 65 | |
| 181 | 1.3B USD | 53 | 53 | |
| 184 | 12.5B HKD (≈$1.6B) | 52 | 34 | |
| 184 | 243M MYR (≈$54M) | 52 | 41 | |
| 184 | 14.8B ILS (≈$4.0B) | 52 | 63 | |
| 184 | 2.7B USD | 52 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score