Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Reading International, Inc.
How Reading International, Inc. stacks up
RDIB · against 509 other Communication Services companies
Profitability
21/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #401 of 510 · scores higher than 21% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score51 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including RDIB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 21?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, operating margin and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 87% of peers. Return on assets: -2.9% vs peer median 2.7%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 75% of peers. Operating margin: 1.2% vs peer median 8.2%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 71% of peers. Return on invested capital: 1.4% vs peer median 6.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RDIB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RDIB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 460 reported | 1.4% | 6.0% | 29% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 506 reported | 1.2% | 8.2% | 25% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 496 reported | -2.9% | 2.7% | 13% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 475 reported | Not reported | 5.4% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 513 reported | 15.5% | 46.2% | 11% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RDIB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.62T JPY (≈$11.0B) | 100 | 79 | |
| 1 | 67.5B INR (≈$811M) | 100 | 35 | |
| 3 | 18.2B JPY (≈$124M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 3 | 7.9B TWD (≈$244M) | 99 | 73 | |
| 3 | 82.5B USD | 99 | 70 | |
| 401 | 3.2B CNY (≈$452M) | 21 | 57 | |
| 401 | 32.3B KRW (≈$23M) | 21 | 49 | |
| 401 | 8.5B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 21 | 29 | |
| 401 | 1.2B NOK (≈$110M) | 21 | ||
| 401 | 240M USD | 21 | 21 | |
| 406 | 1.3B HKD (≈$171M) | 20 | 42 | |
| 406 | 9.3B JPY (≈$63M) | 20 | 37 | |
| 406 | 10.3B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 20 | 34 | |
| 406 | 485M SEK (≈$49M) | 20 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score