Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
RAMP · against 448 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #151 of 449 · scores higher than 67% of peers · safety percentile 65
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)44 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including RAMP · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity and current ratio, but weaker beta than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | RAMP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 436 reported | 0.03× | 0.25× | 82% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 432 reported | 1.25 | 0.89 | 29% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 445 reported | 2.66× | 1.88× | 68% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 2 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 75 | |
| 3 | 2.0B USD | 99 | 45 | |
| 4 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 5 | 3.5B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 147 | 1.8B USD | 66 | 63 | |
| 148 | 7.9B MYR (≈$1.7B) | 66 | 63 | |
| 149 | 174.5B JPY (≈$1.2B) | 66 | 72 | |
| 150 | 641.0B JPY (≈$4.4B) | 66 | 70 | |
| 151 | 2.3B USD | 65 | 79 | |
| 152 | 14.5B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 65 | 35 | |
| 153 | 1.4B USD | 65 | 55 | |
| 154 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.3B) | 65 | 35 | |
| 155 | 4.0B USD | 65 | 84 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score