Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ralliant Corporation
How Ralliant Corporation stacks up
RAL · against 1,666 other Technology companies
Valuation
23/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #1,276 of 1,667 · scores higher than 23% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score167 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including RAL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 23?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -15.6% vs peer median 2.2%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -11.9% vs peer median 4.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.2% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RAL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RAL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,632 reported | -15.3% | 2.3% | 6% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 4.5% | 4.3% | 51% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 725 reported | 4.2% | 2.7% | 60% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,634 reported | 19.4% | 33.4% | 28% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RAL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1,276 | 1.4B USD | 23 | 37 | |
| 1,276 | 3.5B USD | 23 | 35 | |
| 1,276 | 3.4B USD | 23 | 39 | |
| 1,276 | 1.8B USD | 23 | 56 | |
| 1,276 | 7.9B USD | 23 | 16 | |
| 1,276 | 1.1B USD | 23 | 39 | |
| 1,276 | 2.1B USD | 23 | 9 | |
| 1,293 | 3.3B CNY (≈$466M) | 22 | 17 | |
| 1,293 | 28.9B HKD (≈$3.7B) | 22 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score