Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
RACE · against 37 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #33 of 38 · scores higher than 11% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score12 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including RACE · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | RACE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 38 reported | 2.5% | 3.6% | 24% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 39 reported | 3.7% | 5.5% | 16% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 27 reported | 2.2% | 3.7% | 19% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 39 reported | 6.1% | 12.5% | 29% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 114.1B USD | 96 | 91 | |
| 2 | 659.6B HKD (≈$84.4B) | 86 | 72 | |
| 3 | 34.6B EUR (≈$38.1B) | 81 | 42 | |
| 4 | 34.3B EUR (≈$37.7B) | 73 | 36 | |
| 5 | 78.5B EUR (≈$86.4B) | 71 | 58 | |
| 30 | 89.1B AUD (≈$58.8B) | 26 | 41 | |
| 31 | 100.0B USD | 23 | 58 | |
| 31 | 108.6B USD | 23 | 43 | |
| 33 | 79.0B USD | 22 | 61 | |
| 33 | 72.8B USD | 22 | 62 | |
| 35 | 119.4B USD | 21 | 39 | |
| 36 | 81.9B USD | 20 | 45 | |
| 37 | 79.4B USD | 16 | 46 | |
| 38 | 4.05T INR (≈$48.6B) | 15 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score