Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
RACE · against 40 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #9 of 41 · scores higher than 80% of peers · safety percentile 62
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)2 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including RACE · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker debt / equity than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | RACE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 33 reported | 0.86× | 0.86× | 50% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 41 reported | 0.60 | 0.96 | 70% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 39 reported | 2.43× | 1.14× | 82% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.71T JPY (≈$38.8B) | 93 | 82 | |
| 2 | 2.15T MXN (≈$116.3B) | 91 | 87 | |
| 3 | 114.1B USD | 89 | 91 | |
| 4 | 40.6B USD | 89 | 61 | |
| 5 | 3.73T INR (≈$44.8B) | 87 | 64 | |
| 6 | 458.9B HKD (≈$58.7B) | 72 | 53 | |
| 7 | 73.8B EUR (≈$81.2B) | 71 | 58 | |
| 8 | 97.6B CHF (≈$112.3B) | 63 | 59 | |
| 9 | 72.8B USD | 62 | 62 | |
| 10 | 74.3B USD | 58 | 66 | |
| 11 | 678.2B CNY (≈$94.9B) | 55 | 69 | |
| 12 | 659.6B HKD (≈$84.4B) | 53 | 72 | |
| 13 | 57.2B USD | 47 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score