Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ryder System, Inc.
How Ryder System, Inc. stacks up
R · against 445 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
40/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #316 of 446 · scores higher than 29% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score51 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including R · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 40?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 62% of peers. Revenue growth: 1.1% vs peer median 4.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 4.7% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = R, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | R | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 462 reported | 1.1% | 8.4% | 21% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 328 reported | 4.7% | 9.2% | 43% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 437 reported | 2.3% | 5.2% | 34% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around R| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 727M USD | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 308 | 8.8B USD | 41 | 54 | |
| 308 | 4.3B USD | 41 | 35 | |
| 308 | 34.2B USD | 41 | 40 | |
| 316 | 896M USD | 40 | 34 | |
| 316 | 10.8B USD | 40 | 39 | |
| 316 | 2.9B USD | 40 | 48 | |
| 319 | 1.2B USD | 39 | 28 | |
| 319 | 321M USD | 39 | 12 | |
| 319 | 75.7B USD | 39 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score