Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
QTWO · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #1,100 of 1,698 · scores higher than 35% of peers · safety percentile 35
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)169 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including QTWO · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker current ratio and beta than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | QTWO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.06× | 0.26× | 74% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 1.33 | 0.84 | 23% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 0.94× | 1.83× | 10% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 1,096 | 288.7B USD | 35 | 63 | |
| 1,097 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 2.1B EUR (≈$2.4B) |
| 35 |
| 57 |
| 1,098 | 42.3B TWD (≈$1.3B) | 35 | 49 |
| 1,099 | 901M USD | 35 | 58 |
| 1,100 | 4.4B USD | 35 | 62 |
| 1,101 | 57M EUR (≈$63M) | 35 | 53 |
| 1,102 | 63.1B JPY (≈$429M) | 35 | 54 |
| 1,103 | 23.8B CNY (≈$3.3B) | 35 | 41 |
| 1,104 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 35 | 65 |