Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
QTWO · against 356 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #228 of 357 · scores higher than 36% of peers · safety percentile 35
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)38 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including QTWO · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker current ratio and beta than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | QTWO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 342 reported | 0.06× | 0.30× | 77% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 342 reported | 1.33 | 1.01 | 28% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 353 reported | 0.94× | 1.85× | 8% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 2 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 75 | |
| 3 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 8.7B USD | 100 | ||
| 5 | 3.5B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 224 | 18.0B BRL (≈$3.2B) | 37 | 64 | |
| 225 | 6.4B USD | 36 | 62 | |
| 226 | 388.6B JPY (≈$2.6B) | 36 | 73 | |
| 227 | 2.1B EUR (≈$2.4B) | 35 | 57 | |
| 228 | 4.4B USD | 35 | 62 | |
| 229 | 23.8B CNY (≈$3.3B) | 35 | 41 | |
| 230 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 35 | 65 | |
| 231 | 74.9B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 35 | 46 | |
| 232 | 34.7B CNY (≈$4.9B) | 35 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score