Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
QTWO · against 357 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #130 of 358 · scores higher than 63% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score50 peers with a profitability score of 70–79, including QTWO · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its return on assets, return on invested capital and operating margin, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
| Metric | QTWO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 339 reported | 12.3% | 9.7% | 58% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 356 reported | 10.0% | 8.2% | 55% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 346 reported | 9.5% | 4.0% | 84% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 339 reported | 15.0% | 10.7% | 66% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 359 reported | 57.0% | 37.9% | 76% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.8B AUD (≈$3.2B) | 100 | 71 | |
| 2 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 99 | 94 | |
| 2 | 4.0B USD | 99 | 84 | |
| 2 | 7.3B USD | 99 | 68 | |
| 5 | 388.6B JPY (≈$2.6B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 125 | 2.8B USD | 72 | 70 | |
| 125 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 6.8B USD |
| 72 |
| 52 |
| 130 | 45.9B CNY (≈$6.4B) | 71 | 73 |
| 130 | 343.0B JPY (≈$2.3B) | 71 | 66 |
| 130 | 4.4B USD | 71 | 62 |
| 130 | 6.2B USD | 71 | 53 |
| 134 | 35.9B CNY (≈$5.0B) | 70 | 69 |
| 134 | 7.6B USD | 70 | 69 |
| 134 | 5.2B USD | 70 | 47 |