Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Restaurant Brands International Inc.
How Restaurant Brands International Inc. stacks up
QSR · against 75 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
40/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #38 of 76 · scores higher than 49% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score12 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including QSR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 40?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 61% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.3% vs peer median 8.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.8% vs peer median 6.1%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.0% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = QSR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | QSR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 74 reported | 5.4% | 4.4% | 60% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 78 reported | 6.9% | 7.2% | 47% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 43 reported | 4.8% | 4.4% | 62% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 74 reported | 14.8% | 20.2% | 41% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around QSR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 219.5B CNY (≈$30.7B) | 98 | 66 | |
| 2 | 37.54T KRW (≈$27.0B) | 97 | 65 | |
| 2 | 150.1B HKD (≈$19.2B) | 97 | 79 | |
| 4 | 4.04T JPY (≈$27.5B) | 93 | 76 | |
| 5 | 31.01T KRW (≈$22.3B) | 91 | 59 | |
| 33 | 17.2B GBP (≈$22.4B) | 46 | 60 | |
| 35 | 35.5B CAD (≈$25.9B) | 45 | 51 | |
| 36 | 57.2B USD | 44 | 50 | |
| 37 | 24.8B USD | 43 | 54 | |
| 38 | 34.0B USD | 40 | 52 | |
| 38 | 47.0B USD | 40 | 61 | |
| 40 | 3.98T JPY (≈$27.1B) | 39 | 74 | |
| 40 | 51.5B USD | 39 | 50 | |
| 42 | 27.1B USD | 38 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score