Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Quantum Corporation
How Quantum Corporation stacks up
QMCO · against 1,707 other Technology companies
Profitability
21/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #1,341 of 1,708 · scores higher than 21% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score171 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including QMCO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 21?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its operating margin and return on assets, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 83% of peers. Operating margin: -5.9% vs peer median 6.3%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 74% of peers. Return on assets: -0.4% vs peer median 2.9%
- Return on invested capital is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = QMCO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | QMCO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,598 reported | Not reported | 6.8% | — | — | 33% |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,698 reported | -5.9% | 6.3% | 17% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,668 reported | -0.4% | 2.9% | 26% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,633 reported | Not reported | 7.5% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,712 reported | 37.8% | 33.4% | 56% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around QMCO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.8B AUD (≈$3.2B) | 100 | 71 | |
| 1 | 604M AUD (≈$399M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 3 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 99 | 94 | |
| 3 | 561.7B CNY (≈$78.6B) | 99 | 77 | |
| 3 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 99 | 85 | |
| 1,341 | 1.3B USD | 21 | 37 | |
| 1,341 | 29.6B USD | 21 | 39 | |
| 1,341 | 3.2B SEK (≈$323M) | 21 | 35 | |
| 1,341 | 4.8B AUD (≈$3.1B) | 21 | 39 | |
| 1,341 | 696M USD | 21 | 12 | |
| 1,359 | 26.4B CNY (≈$3.7B) | 20 | 33 | |
| 1,359 | 4.3B CNY (≈$608M) | 20 | 11 | |
| 1,359 | 10.2B TWD (≈$316M) | 20 | 39 | |
| 1,359 | 2.6B CNY (≈$363M) | 20 | 25 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score