Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Papa John's International, Inc.
How Papa John's International, Inc. stacks up
PZZA · against 1,603 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Profitability
71/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #458 of 1,604 · scores higher than 71% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score160 peers with a profitability score of 70–79, including PZZA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 71?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its return on invested capital, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 64% of peers. Operating margin: 4.3% vs peer median 6.4%
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 3.4% vs peer median 3.3%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 90% of peers. Return on invested capital: 27.2% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PZZA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PZZA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,510 reported | 27.2% | 7.3% | 90% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,601 reported | 4.3% | 6.4% | 36% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,528 reported | 3.4% | 3.3% | 51% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,476 reported | Not reported | 7.7% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,613 reported | 20.4% | 30.2% | 32% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PZZA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 100 | 96 | |
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 3 | 880.5B TWD (≈$27.3B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 3 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 458 | 1.93T JPY (≈$13.1B) | 71 | 53 | |
| 458 | 11.0B EUR (≈$12.1B) | 71 | 42 | |
| 458 | 42.1B MXN (≈$2.3B) | 71 | 63 | |
| 458 | 423M EUR (≈$465M) | 71 | 66 | |
| 458 | 611M USD | 71 | 37 | |
| 474 | 34.9B CNY (≈$4.9B) | 70 | 53 | |
| 474 | 20.3B TWD (≈$629M) | 70 | 48 | |
| 474 | 42.7B JPY (≈$290M) | 70 | 80 | |
| 474 | 9.8B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 70 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score