Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Papa John's International, Inc.
How Papa John's International, Inc. stacks up
PZZA · against 641 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
71/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #139 of 642 · scores higher than 77% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score52 peers with a profitability score of 70–79, including PZZA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 71?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its return on invested capital, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 64% of peers. Operating margin: 4.3% vs peer median 6.4%
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 3.4% vs peer median 3.3%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 90% of peers. Return on invested capital: 27.2% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PZZA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PZZA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 615 reported | 27.2% | 6.2% | 94% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 641 reported | 4.3% | 5.8% | 38% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 607 reported | 3.4% | 2.6% | 60% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 595 reported | Not reported | 5.9% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 643 reported | 20.4% | 28.8% | 34% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PZZA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 9.10T IDR (≈$564M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 3 | 11.2B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 98 | 49 | |
| 3 | 418M USD | 98 | 53 | |
| 5 | 22.1B TWD (≈$685M) | 97 | 65 | |
| 139 | 7.5B CNY (≈$1.0B) | 71 | 72 | |
| 139 | 71.7B JPY (≈$488M) | 71 | 70 | |
| 139 | 178.8B JPY (≈$1.2B) | 71 | 75 | |
| 139 | 423M EUR (≈$465M) | 71 | 66 | |
| 139 | 611M USD | 71 | 37 | |
| 150 | 20.3B TWD (≈$629M) | 70 | 48 | |
| 150 | 42.7B INR (≈$513M) | 70 | 66 | |
| 150 | 473M USD | 70 | 62 | |
| 150 | 830M CAD (≈$606M) | 70 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score