Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to PayPal Holdings, Inc.
How PayPal Holdings, Inc. stacks up
PYPL · against 24 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Growth
52/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #18 of 25 · scores higher than 25% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score4 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including PYPL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 52?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.4% vs peer median 10.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.3% vs peer median 7.4%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 72% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 35.6% vs peer median 10.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PYPL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PYPL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 25 reported | 4.3% | 10.6% | 13% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 25 reported | 35.6% | 25.2% | 67% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 24 reported | 6.4% | 11.5% | 13% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PYPL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 88.7B USD | 84 | 39 | |
| 2 | 477.0B HKD (≈$61.1B) | 75 | 60 | |
| 3 | 81.4B USD | 72 | 54 | |
| 4 | 6.04T INR (≈$72.4B) | 70 | 60 | |
| 5 | 43.6B GBP (≈$56.7B) | 69 | 48 | |
| 14 | 42.8B USD | 61 | 39 | |
| 15 | 43.8B USD | 60 | 57 | |
| 15 | 46.5B USD | 60 | 44 | |
| 17 | 46.6B USD | 55 | 40 | |
| 18 | 49.8B USD | 52 | 55 | |
| 18 | 31.1B USD | 52 | 65 | |
| 20 | 67.1B USD | 51 | 51 | |
| 21 | 391.0B SEK (≈$39.1B) | 48 | 57 | |
| 22 | 56.1B EUR (≈$61.7B) | 44 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score