Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Quanta Services, Inc.
How Quanta Services, Inc. stacks up
PWR · against 57 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
91/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #5 of 58 · scores higher than 89% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score7 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including PWR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 91?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 76% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 33.6% vs peer median 7.1%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 90% of peers. Revenue growth: 26.3% vs peer median 4.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 92% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 21.5% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PWR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PWR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 58 reported | 26.3% | 7.8% | 93% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 54 reported | 33.6% | 7.2% | 83% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 57 reported | 21.5% | 6.5% | 95% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PWR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 2 | 90.8B USD | 97 | 59 | |
| 3 | 51.7B USD | 95 | 58 | |
| 4 | 103.7B GBP (≈$134.9B) | 94 | 59 | |
| 5 | 137.0B USD | 91 | 39 | |
| 5 | 71.0B USD | 91 | 68 | |
| 5 | 98.8B USD | 91 | 47 | |
| 8 | 2.39T THB (≈$67.1B) | 86 | 64 | |
| 9 | 118.1B EUR (≈$129.9B) | 84 | 60 | |
| 10 | 89.0B USD | 83 | 58 | |
| 10 | 46.9B EUR (≈$51.6B) | 83 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score