Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PSNL · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #884 of 1,373 · scores higher than 36% of peers · safety percentile 36
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)137 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including PSNL · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | PSNL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.16× | 0.24× | 58% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 2.32 | 0.53 | 3% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 5.28× | 2.62× | 75% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 880 | 11.6B USD | 36 | 56 | |
| 881 | 18.5B USD |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 54 |
| 882 | 24.48T IDR (≈$1.5B) | 36 | 62 |
| 883 | 3.6B AUD (≈$2.4B) | 36 | 59 |
| 884 | 1.7B USD | 36 | 21 |
| 885 | 8.8B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 36 | 54 |
| 886 | 285.2B USD | 35 | 63 |
| 887 | 64.8B EUR (≈$71.3B) | 35 | 51 |
| 888 | 326.5B KRW (≈$235M) | 35 | 52 |