Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Paramount Skydance Corporation
How Paramount Skydance Corporation stacks up
PSKY · against 470 other Communication Services companies
Valuation
48/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #244 of 471 · scores higher than 48% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score47 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including PSKY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 48?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.A mix: stronger EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Communication Services peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 67% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.3% vs peer median 2.9%
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 66% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.6% vs peer median 8.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PSKY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PSKY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 461 reported | 0.3% | 3.0% | 33% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 493 reported | 12.6% | 8.7% | 66% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 227 reported | Not reported | 7.6% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 467 reported | 107.4% | 48.9% | 76% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PSKY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 105.8B KRW (≈$76M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 694.0B KRW (≈$500M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2.6B HKD (≈$329M) | 99 | 80 | |
| 3 | 3.1B HKD (≈$398M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 3 | 226M SEK (≈$23M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 239 | 2.9B USD | 49 | 57 | |
| 244 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score