Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Public Storage
How Public Storage stacks up
PSA · against 12 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
31/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #6 of 13 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score3 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including PSA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 31?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield, earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 67% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.6% vs peer median 6.5%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 64% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.5% vs peer median 5.3%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 61% of peers. EBITDA yield: 4.7% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PSA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PSA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 13 reported | 3.1% | 2.9% | 58% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 12 reported | 4.7% | 4.6% | 64% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 11 reported | 4.6% | 3.7% | 80% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 12 reported | 8.3% | 17.9% | 36% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PSA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 54.4B USD | 48 | 57 | |
| 2 | 84.3B USD | 45 | 56 | |
| 3 | 87.3B USD | 43 | 55 | |
| 4 | 39.2B USD | 41 | 56 | |
| 5 | 37.8B USD | 34 | 45 | |
| 6 | 34.5B USD | 31 | 51 | |
| 6 | 62.3B USD | 31 | 49 | |
| 8 | 56.1B AUD (≈$37.0B) | 29 | 70 | |
| 9 | 34.7B USD | 22 | 45 | |
| 10 | 68.1B USD | 19 | 33 | |
| 10 | 48.0B USD | 19 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score