Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Pershing Square Inc.
How Pershing Square Inc. stacks up
PS · against 268 other Financial Services companies
Valuation
5/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #255 of 269 · scores higher than 5% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score26 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including PS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 5?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Financial Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -2.4% vs peer median 5.7%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 84% of peers. EBITDA yield: 0.4% vs peer median 6.9%
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 410 reported | -2.4% | 5.6% | 11% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 206 reported | 0.4% | 6.8% | 16% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 183 reported | Not reported | 6.1% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 401 reported | 7.3% | 83.1% | 6% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 498M USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 82M USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 3 | 827M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 252 | 5.0B USD | 6 | 47 | |
| 252 | 5.7B USD | 6 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score