Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PRGS · against 474 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #456 of 475 · scores higher than 4% of peers · safety percentile 5
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)43 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including PRGS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | PRGS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 462 reported | 2.62× | 0.23× | 4% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 456 reported | 0.82 | 0.82 | 50% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 471 reported | 0.81× | 1.86× | 4% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 3 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 4 | 2.0B USD | 99 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 452 | 8.9B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 7 | 29 | |
| 453 | 4.20T KRW (≈$3.0B) | 6 | 29 | |
| 454 | 13.7B CNY (≈$1.9B) | 6 | 51 | |
| 455 | 3.5B USD | 5 | 35 | |
| 456 | 1.8B USD | 5 | 58 | |
| 457 | 3.4B USD | 4 | 24 | |
| 458 | 1.6B USD | 4 | 44 | |
| 459 | 1.0B USD | 4 | 35 | |
| 460 | 830M EUR (≈$913M) | 4 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score