Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to PRA Group, Inc.
How PRA Group, Inc. stacks up
PRAA · against 131 other Financial Services companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
7/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #125 of 132 · scores higher than 4% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score12 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including PRAA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 7?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Financial Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -35.4% vs peer median 5.7%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 71% of peers. EBITDA yield: 1.7% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PRAA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PRAA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 191 reported | -33.8% | 4.8% | 2% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 80 reported | 10.9% | 6.9% | 78% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 133 reported | -5.1% | 5.6% | 12% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 187 reported | 139.7% | 63.8% | 87% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PRAA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 498M USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 82M USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 3 | 827M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 122 | 38M USD | 8 | ||
| 122 | 219M USD | 8 | 20 | |
| 125 | 385M USD | 7 | 36 | |
| 125 | 3.9B USD | 7 | 40 | |
| 125 | 748M USD | 7 | 35 | |
| 128 | 5.0B USD | 6 | 47 | |
| 128 | 5.7B USD | 6 | 3 | |
| 128 | 249M USD | 6 | 31 | |
| 131 | 18.7B USD | 5 | 19 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score