Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PPTA · against 1,354 other Basic Materials companies
Ranked #40 of 1,355 · scores higher than 97% of peers · safety percentile 97
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)136 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including PPTA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | PPTA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,322 reported | 0.01× | 0.36× | 94% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,325 reported | 0.76 | 0.66 | 41% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,285 reported | 12.34× | 1.77× | 97% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26.3B INR (≈$316M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 226M USD | 100 | 68 | |
| 3 | 6.4B CNY (≈$902M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 3 | 7.6B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 3 | 17.3B CNY (≈$2.4B) | 99 | 44 | |
| 36 | 422M EUR (≈$464M) | 97 | 76 | |
| 37 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 98M USD |
| 97 |
| 32 |
| 38 | 3.5B USD | 97 | 76 |
| 39 | 54.2B SAR (≈$14.6B) | 97 | 77 |
| 40 | 2.0B USD | 97 | 36 |
| 41 | 12.0B AUD (≈$8.0B) | 97 | 74 |
| 42 | 897M CAD (≈$655M) | 97 |
| 43 | 5.1B CNY (≈$710M) | 97 | 42 |
| 44 | 13.6B TWD (≈$421M) | 97 | 72 |