Ranked #189 of 399 · scores higher than 53% of peers · safety percentile 53
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)
40 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including PPT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why “Moderate relative risk”?
The measures below combine into a safety percentile of 53 among Financial Services companies. It is relative: 67 or more is lower relative risk, 33–66 moderate, below 33 higher.
A mix: stronger beta, but weaker current ratio than most Financial Services peers.
▼fewer short-term assets to cover bills due within a year: weaker than 93% of peers. Current ratio: 0.34× vs peer median 2.02×
●Debt / equity is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
▲a share price that has swung less with the market: stronger than 85% of peers. Beta: 0.27 vs peer median 0.70
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PPT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
PPT
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Debt / equityLower is better · 349 reported
Not reported
0.57×
—
—
33%
BetaLower is better · 394 reported
0.27
0.67
85%
33%
Current ratioHigher is better · 372 reported
0.34×
2.04×
7%
33%
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
