Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to PPL Corporation
How PPL Corporation stacks up
PPL · against 351 other Utilities companies
Growth
72/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #98 of 352 · scores higher than 72% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score36 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including PPL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 72?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Utilities peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.0% vs peer median 2.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 69% of peers. Revenue growth: 7.3% vs peer median 2.5%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 80% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 25.9% vs peer median 1.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PPL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PPL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 354 reported | 7.3% | 2.5% | 69% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 284 reported | 25.9% | 1.6% | 80% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 351 reported | 3.0% | 2.0% | 57% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PPL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 48.3B BRL (≈$8.7B) | 100 | 69 | |
| 1 | 9.1B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 3 | 7.9B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 85 | |
| 3 | 636M EUR (≈$700M) | 99 | 64 | |
| 3 | 2.5B USD | 99 | 41 | |
| 95 | 9.0B BRL (≈$1.6B) | 73 | 83 | |
| 98 | 10.9B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 72 | 59 | |
| 98 | 1.97T CLP (≈$2.2B) | 72 | 77 | |
| 98 | 29.1B USD | 72 | 48 | |
| 98 | 26.9B USD | 72 | 50 | |
| 102 | 440M USD | 71 | 76 | |
| 102 | 797.6B INR (≈$9.6B) | 71 | 57 | |
| 102 | 21.4B USD | 71 | 46 | |
| 105 | 4.3B CNY (≈$601M) | 70 | 40 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score