Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Public Policy Holding Company, Inc.
How Public Policy Holding Company, Inc. stacks up
PPHC · against 2,393 other Industrials companies
Valuation
17/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #1,976 of 2,394 · scores higher than 17% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score197 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including PPHC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 17?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -11.4% vs peer median 3.8%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -8.5% vs peer median 6.9%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.7% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PPHC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PPHC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 2,368 reported | -18.1% | 3.8% | 4% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 2,432 reported | -2.3% | 7.0% | 8% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 795 reported | 4.7% | 3.7% | 58% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 2,381 reported | 33.8% | 50.5% | 34% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PPHC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1,976 | 2.9B USD | 17 | 44 | |
| 1,976 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score