Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Public Policy Holding Company, Inc.
How Public Policy Holding Company, Inc. stacks up
PPHC · against 704 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
17/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #493 of 705 · scores higher than 29% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score82 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including PPHC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 17?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -11.4% vs peer median 3.8%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -8.5% vs peer median 6.9%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.7% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PPHC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PPHC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 700 reported | -18.1% | 2.6% | 5% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 716 reported | -2.3% | 6.5% | 13% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 161 reported | 4.7% | 3.6% | 56% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 707 reported | 33.8% | 59.3% | 24% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PPHC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 2.9B BRL (≈$517M) | 100 | 68 | |
| 493 | 348M EUR (≈$383M) | 17 | 53 | |
| 493 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score