Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PPC · against 120 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #67 of 121 · scores higher than 45% of peers · safety percentile 46
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)16 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including PPC · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Defensive norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | PPC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 122 reported | 0.83× | 0.41× | 27% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 118 reported | 0.28 | 0.33 | 57% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 116 reported | 1.35× | 1.56× | 34% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29.8B HKD (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 2 | 1.06T JPY (≈$7.2B) | 96 | 80 | |
| 3 | 58.1B CNY (≈$8.1B) | 94 | 39 | |
| 4 | 37.3B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 91 | 63 | |
| 5 | 1.68T JPY (≈$11.4B) | 91 | 64 | |
| 63 | 207.1B TRY (≈$6.2B) | 49 | 73 | |
| 64 | 81.9B HKD (≈$10.5B) | 49 | 48 | |
| 65 | 3.8B EUR (≈$4.2B) | 48 | 70 | |
| 66 | 82.5B MXN (≈$4.5B) | 47 | 60 | |
| 67 | 6.5B USD | 46 | 51 | |
| 68 | 3.4B USD | 46 | 54 | |
| 69 | 698.1B JPY (≈$4.7B) | 46 | 35 | |
| 70 | 426.3B TRY (≈$12.8B) | 45 | 53 | |
| 71 | 3.0B EUR (≈$3.3B) | 43 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score