Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
POST · against 153 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #131 of 154 · scores higher than 15% of peers · safety percentile 15
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)15 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including POST · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, which is weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | POST | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 152 reported | 2.47× | 0.39× | 5% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 151 reported | 0.31 | 0.35 | 53% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 147 reported | 1.85× | 1.61× | 59% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 2 | 2.74T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 99 | 49 | |
| 3 | 29.8B HKD (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 4 | 398.9B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 98 | 77 | |
| 5 | 3.1B USD | 97 | 89 | |
| 127 | 2.71T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 18 | 52 | |
| 128 | 3.4B CAD (≈$2.5B) | 17 | 49 | |
| 129 | 2.7B USD | 17 | 42 | |
| 130 | 6.9B USD | 16 | 36 | |
| 131 | 3.8B USD | 15 | 50 | |
| 132 | 54.1B HKD (≈$6.9B) | 14 | 41 | |
| 133 | 2.4B GBP (≈$3.1B) | 14 | 36 | |
| 134 | 2.1B USD | 13 | 16 | |
| 135 | 4.9B USD | 13 | 64 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score