Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to PrimeEnergy Resources Corporation
How PrimeEnergy Resources Corporation stacks up
PNRG · against 386 other Energy companies
Valuation
90/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #38 of 387 · scores higher than 90% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score41 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including PNRG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 90?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 7.8% vs peer median 5.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 88% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 15.4% vs peer median 6.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 95% of peers. EBITDA yield: 33.2% vs peer median 12.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PNRG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PNRG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 384 reported | 5.2% | 5.8% | 46% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 390 reported | 33.2% | 12.4% | 95% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 249 reported | 15.4% | 6.0% | 88% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 378 reported | 68.8% | 60.0% | 57% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PNRG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 2 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 517M CAD (≈$378M) | 99 | 47 | |
| 34 | 126M SGD (≈$96M) | 91 | 69 | |
| 38 | 35.9B HKD (≈$4.6B) | 90 | 69 | |
| 38 | 551M GBP (≈$716M) | 90 | 37 | |
| 38 | 27.54T IDR (≈$1.7B) | 90 | 63 | |
| 38 | 316M USD | 90 | 65 | |
| 42 | 229.8B NOK (≈$21.8B) | 89 | 55 | |
| 42 | 17.6B NOK (≈$1.7B) | 89 | 75 | |
| 42 | 22.3B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 89 | 72 | |
| 42 | 265M GBP (≈$344M) | 89 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score