Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to PennantPark Investment Corporation
How PennantPark Investment Corporation stacks up
PNNT · against 366 other Financial Services companies
Growth
7/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #340 of 367 · scores higher than 7% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score35 peers with a growth score of 0–9, including PNNT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 7?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Financial Services peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 97% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -80.5% vs peer median 10.0%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 90% of peers. Revenue growth: -28.6% vs peer median 7.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PNNT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PNNT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 395 reported | -28.6% | 7.4% | 10% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 299 reported | -80.5% | 9.9% | 3% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 329 reported | Not reported | 10.0% | — | — | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PNNT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 883M USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 322M USD | 99 | 58 | |
| 1 | 1.5B CHF (≈$1.7B) | 99 | 79 | |
| 1 | 16.5B GBP (≈$21.4B) | 99 | 41 | |
| 1 | 761M USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 336 | 848M USD | 8 | 36 | |
| 340 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score