Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust
How PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust stacks up
PMT · against 243 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
75/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #65 of 244 · scores higher than 72% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score31 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including PMT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 75?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, which is stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -1463.9% vs peer median 6.5%
- EBITDA yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 92% of peers. Earnings yield: 18.1% vs peer median 5.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PMT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PMT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 262 reported | 18.1% | 5.5% | 95% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 242 reported | Not reported | 5.6% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 92 reported | -1463.9% | 9.0% | 0% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 263 reported | 190.7% | 121.2% | 79% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PMT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 2 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 2 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 2 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 2 | 9.23T IDR (≈$572M) | 99 | 88 | |
| 62 | 1.1B USD | 76 | 43 | |
| 62 | 536M USD | 76 | 65 | |
| 65 | 374M USD | 75 | 66 | |
| 65 | 749M USD | 75 | 74 | |
| 65 | 688M USD | 75 | 65 | |
| 65 | 936M EUR (≈$1.0B) | 75 | 62 | |
| 69 | 708M USD | 74 | 58 | |
| 69 | 804M USD | 74 | 35 | |
| 71 | 1.0B EUR (≈$1.1B) | 73 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score