Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Community Healthcare Trust Incorporated
How Community Healthcare Trust Incorporated stacks up
CHCT · against 662 other Real Estate companies
Valuation
75/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #164 of 663 · scores higher than 75% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score66 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including CHCT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 75?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.6% vs peer median 5.3%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 69% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 10.3% vs peer median 6.5%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 83% of peers. EBITDA yield: 8.6% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CHCT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CHCT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 708 reported | 5.1% | 5.3% | 48% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 681 reported | 8.6% | 5.3% | 83% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 307 reported | 10.3% | 6.8% | 69% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 724 reported | 117.3% | 112.8% | 53% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CHCT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 227M MYR (≈$50M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 3 | 394M HKD (≈$50M) | 99 | 33 | |
| 3 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 157 | 307M EUR (≈$338M) | 76 | 59 | |
| 157 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score