Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ePlus inc.
How ePlus inc. stacks up
PLUS · against 447 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
53/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #232 of 448 · scores higher than 47% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score44 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including PLUS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 53?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 2.5% vs peer median 11.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.7% vs peer median 4.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 69% of peers. Revenue growth: 15.7% vs peer median 8.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PLUS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PLUS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 452 reported | 15.7% | 10.3% | 64% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 300 reported | 2.5% | 8.5% | 41% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 448 reported | 4.7% | 6.0% | 44% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PLUS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 4 | 9.3B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 55 | |
| 4 | 39.3B TWD (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 81 | |
| 232 | 25.8B CNY (≈$3.6B) | 53 | 27 | |
| 232 | 206.3B JPY (≈$1.4B) | 53 | 54 | |
| 232 | 208.8B JPY (≈$1.4B) | 53 | 80 | |
| 232 | 1.4B GBP (≈$1.9B) | 53 | 61 | |
| 232 | 2.3B USD | 53 | 64 | |
| 238 | 641.0B JPY (≈$4.4B) | 52 | 70 | |
| 238 | 3.9B USD | 52 | 52 | |
| 238 | 5.4B ILS (≈$1.5B) | 52 | 63 | |
| 238 | 15.7B DKK (≈$2.4B) | 52 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score