Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PLTS · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #25 of 1,698 · scores higher than 99% of peers · safety percentile 99
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including PLTS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | PLTS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.16× | 0.26× | 60% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | Not reported | 0.84 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 7.12× | 1.83× | 94% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 21 | 2.60T JPY (≈$17.7B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 22 | 6.6B CNY (≈$922M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 23 | 625.8B JPY (≈$4.3B) | 99 | 78 | |
| 24 | 3.8B CNY (≈$530M) | 99 | 54 | |
| 25 | 316M USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 26 | 18.16T JPY (≈$123.5B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 27 | 16.2B JPY (≈$110M) | 98 | 75 | |
| 28 | 27.4B CNY (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 65 | |
| 29 | 311.5B JPY (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 86 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score