Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Playtika Holding Corp.
How Playtika Holding Corp. stacks up
PLTK · against 147 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Profitability
12/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #124 of 148 · scores higher than 14% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score23 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including PLTK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 12?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, return on invested capital and operating margin, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 95% of peers. Return on assets: -8.5% vs peer median 2.7%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 86% of peers. Return on invested capital: -5.0% vs peer median 6.0%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 83% of peers. Operating margin: -3.4% vs peer median 8.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PLTK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PLTK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 135 reported | -5.0% | 4.3% | 18% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 147 reported | -3.4% | 6.5% | 21% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 144 reported | -8.5% | 1.7% | 6% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 136 reported | Not reported | 3.8% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 149 reported | 73.5% | 35.6% | 88% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PLTK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 67.5B INR (≈$811M) | 100 | 35 | |
| 2 | 82.4B JPY (≈$560M) | 97 | 76 | |
| 2 | 6.3B SEK (≈$635M) | 97 | 66 | |
| 2 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 97 | 61 | |
| 5 | 598M CHF (≈$688M) | 96 | 59 | |
| 122 | 7.8B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 14 | 36 | |
| 124 | 7.7B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 12 | 25 | |
| 124 | 509.1B CLP (≈$560M) | 12 | 48 | |
| 124 | 1.0B USD | 12 | 39 | |
| 124 | 767M USD | 12 | 28 | |
| 128 | 3.1B CNY (≈$436M) | 11 | 25 | |
| 128 | 10.4B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 11 | 31 | |
| 128 | 388M USD | 11 | 29 | |
| 131 | 5.0B CNY (≈$707M) | 10 | 19 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score