Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Planet Fitness, Inc.
How Planet Fitness, Inc. stacks up
PLNT · against 317 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
91/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #34 of 318 · scores higher than 88% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score42 peers with a profitability score of 90–100, including PLNT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 91?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its operating margin, return on assets and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 85% of peers. Return on assets: 7.9% vs peer median 3.3%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 85% of peers. Return on invested capital: 21.0% vs peer median 7.3%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 98% of peers. Operating margin: 30.9% vs peer median 6.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PLNT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PLNT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 304 reported | 21.0% | 9.9% | 83% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 319 reported | 30.9% | 9.1% | 98% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 301 reported | 7.9% | 4.4% | 80% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 287 reported | Not reported | 12.0% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 321 reported | 58.5% | 32.1% | 89% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PLNT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 2 | 106.7B TWD (≈$3.3B) | 99 | 71 | |
| 2 | 4.6B USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 2 | 2.4B USD | 99 | 65 | |
| 34 | 26.9B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 91 | 84 | |
| 34 | 3.8B USD | 91 | 62 | |
| 34 | 3.9B USD | 91 | 56 | |
| 34 | 2.7B USD | 91 | 69 | |
| 34 | 4.2B USD | 91 | 56 | |
| 34 | 2.3B USD | 91 | 43 | |
| 40 | 16.8B CNY (≈$2.3B) | 90 | 71 | |
| 40 | 7.4B USD | 90 | 64 | |
| 40 | 6.2B USD | 90 | 69 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score