Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PLD · against 5 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Ranked #3 of 6 · scores higher than 60% of peers · safety percentile 25
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)2 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including PLD · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | PLD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 6 reported | 0.64× | 1.15× | 80% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 6 reported | 1.32 | 0.99 | 20% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 6 reported | 0.65× | 0.77× | 40% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 173.8B USD | 67 | 50 | |
| 2 | 68.1B USD | 38 | 33 | |
| 3 | 125.5B USD | 25 | 48 | |
| 4 | 100.1B USD | 24 | 44 | |
| 5 | 87.3B USD | 3 | 55 | |
| 6 | 84.3B USD | 1 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score