Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.
How Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. stacks up
PLAY · against 470 other Communication Services companies
Valuation
31/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #323 of 471 · scores higher than 31% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score47 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including PLAY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 31?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -31.1% vs peer median 2.9%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -5.6% vs peer median 7.4%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 9.6% vs peer median 8.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PLAY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PLAY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 461 reported | -31.1% | 3.0% | 7% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 493 reported | 9.6% | 8.7% | 55% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 227 reported | -5.6% | 7.6% | 12% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 467 reported | 30.7% | 48.9% | 33% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PLAY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 105.8B KRW (≈$76M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 694.0B KRW (≈$500M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2.6B HKD (≈$329M) | 99 | 80 | |
| 3 | 3.1B HKD (≈$398M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 3 | 226M SEK (≈$23M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 319 | 3.5B THB (≈$98M) | 32 | 39 | |
| 323 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score