Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Pinterest, Inc.
How Pinterest, Inc. stacks up
PINS · against 470 other Communication Services companies
Valuation
33/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #314 of 471 · scores higher than 33% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score47 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including PINS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 33?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 74% of peers. EBITDA yield: 2.8% vs peer median 8.6%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.2% vs peer median 2.9%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 66% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 11.2% vs peer median 7.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PINS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PINS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 461 reported | 1.7% | 3.0% | 42% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 493 reported | 2.8% | 8.7% | 26% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 227 reported | 11.1% | 7.6% | 66% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 467 reported | 25.1% | 48.9% | 28% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PINS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 105.8B KRW (≈$76M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 694.0B KRW (≈$500M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2.6B HKD (≈$329M) | 99 | 80 | |
| 3 | 3.1B HKD (≈$398M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 3 | 226M SEK (≈$23M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 314 | 11.4B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 33 | 68 | |
| 314 | 828M CAD (≈$605M) | 33 | 35 | |
| 314 | 2.5B SEK (≈$251M) | 33 | 30 | |
| 314 | 3.8B USD | 33 | 50 | |
| 314 | 11.5B USD | 33 | 55 | |
| 319 | 9.4B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 32 | 58 | |
| 319 | 2.5B CNY (≈$352M) | 32 | 48 | |
| 319 | 2.5B AUD (≈$1.6B) | 32 | 42 | |
| 319 | 3.5B THB (≈$98M) | 32 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score