Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to PicS N.V.
How PicS N.V. stacks up
PICS · against 1,666 other Technology companies
Valuation
93/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #108 of 1,667 · scores higher than 93% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score175 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including PICS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 93?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -16.9% vs peer median 2.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 100% of peers. Earnings yield: 29.4% vs peer median 2.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 100% of peers. EBITDA yield: 123.8% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PICS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PICS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,632 reported | 29.4% | 2.3% | 100% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 123.8% | 4.3% | 100% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 725 reported | -16.9% | 2.7% | 7% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,634 reported | Not reported | 33.4% | — | — | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PICS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 108 | 971M CAD (≈$709M) | 93 | 70 | |
| 108 | 255M USD | 93 | 54 | |
| 108 | 285M EUR (≈$314M) | 93 | 69 | |
| 108 | 17.5B USD | 93 | 93 | |
| 108 | 1.4B USD | 93 | 72 | |
| 108 | 466M SEK (≈$47M) | 93 | 76 | |
| 108 | 10.6B USD | 93 | 68 | |
| 126 | 7.19T KRW (≈$5.2B) | 92 | 48 | |
| 126 | 13.4B HKD (≈$1.7B) | 92 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score