Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PI · against 1,666 other Technology companies
Ranked #1,376 of 1,667 · scores higher than 17% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score166 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including PI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
| Metric | PI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,632 reported | -0.5% | 2.3% | 24% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 0.2% | 4.3% | 20% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 725 reported | 1.1% | 2.7% | 35% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,634 reported | 4.1% | 33.4% | 5% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1,376 | 10.9B USD | 17 | 43 | |
| 1,376 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 3.4B USD |
| 17 |
| 46 |
| 1,376 | 1.4B USD | 17 | 32 |
| 1,376 | 287M USD | 17 | 53 |
| 1,376 | 5.6B USD | 17 | 20 |
| 1,376 | 1.9B SEK (≈$190M) | 17 | 36 |
| 1,376 | 852M USD | 17 | 38 |
| 1,376 | 13.3B USD | 17 | 50 |
| 1,376 | 104.1B USD | 17 | 30 |