Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PHM · against 105 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #5 of 106 · scores higher than 96% of peers · safety percentile 92
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)6 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including PHM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | PHM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 104 reported | 0.19× | 0.71× | 80% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 107 reported | 1.16 | 0.81 | 25% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 101 reported | 7.27× | 1.42× | 98% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 112.0B CNY (≈$15.7B) | 95 | 53 | |
| 2 | 3.98T JPY (≈$27.1B) | 94 | 74 | |
| 3 | 16.1B USD | 93 | 66 | |
| 4 | 5.71T JPY (≈$38.8B) | 93 | 82 | |
| 5 | 24.2B USD | 92 | 66 | |
| 6 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 92 | 91 | |
| 7 | 20.5B USD | 89 | 50 | |
| 8 | 40.6B USD | 89 | 61 | |
| 9 | 880.5B TWD (≈$27.3B) | 87 | 75 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score