Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PGC · against 908 other Banks & Insurance companies
Ranked #687 of 909 · scores higher than 24% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score90 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including PGC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its return on equity and return on assets, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | PGC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 784 reported | 12.6% | 10.4% | 60% | Context only | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 136 reported | Not reported | 14.5% | — | — | Context only |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 913 reported | 0.7% | 1.2% | 28% | 50% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 904 reported | 7.7% | 11.2% | 26% | 50% | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 951 reported | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0% | Context only |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 192.8B JPY (≈$1.3B) | 98 | 47 | |
| 1 | 98.7B JPY (≈$671M) | 98 | 43 | |
| 1 | 66.1B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 1 | 79.2B BRL (≈$14.3B) | 98 | 61 | |
| 1 | 275.9B INR (≈$3.3B) | 98 | 38 | |
| 687 | 1.37T JPY (≈$9.3B) | 24 | 49 | |
| 687 | 297.6B JPY (≈$2.0B) | 24 | 57 | |
| 687 | 63.1B USD | 24 | 67 | |
| 687 | 977M USD | 24 | 31 | |
| 687 | 825M USD | 24 | 36 | |
| 687 | 425M CAD (≈$310M) | 24 | 33 | |
| 687 | 16.1B USD | 24 | 23 | |
| 696 | 21.3B CNY (≈$3.0B) | 23 | 50 | |
| 696 | 4.95T JPY (≈$33.7B) | 23 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score