Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PENN · against 1,603 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #1,532 of 1,604 · scores higher than 4% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score153 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including PENN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its return on assets, return on invested capital and operating margin, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | PENN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,510 reported | -11.8% | 7.3% | 5% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,601 reported | -7.9% | 6.4% | 7% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,528 reported | -6.4% | 3.3% | 4% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,476 reported | -37.6% | 7.7% | 4% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,613 reported | 35.2% | 30.2% | 58% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 100 | 96 | |
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 3 | 880.5B TWD (≈$27.3B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 3 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1,532 | 48M MYR (≈$11M) | 4 | 26 | |
| 1,532 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 61M MYR (≈$13M) |
| 4 |
| 29 |
| 1,532 | 1.8B USD | 4 | 29 |
| 1,532 | 1.4B USD | 4 | 41 |
| 1,532 | 2.3B USD | 4 | 16 |
| 1,532 | 1.0B AUD (≈$679M) | 4 | 7 |
| 1,532 | 110M EUR (≈$121M) | 4 | 7 |
| 1,532 | 263M USD | 4 | 27 |
| 1,532 | 4.1B TRY (≈$123M) | 4 | 6 |