Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PENN · against 400 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #347 of 401 · scores higher than 14% of peers · safety percentile 12
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)48 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including PENN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | PENN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 389 reported | 5.97× | 0.52× | 3% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 388 reported | 1.39 | 0.68 | 9% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 388 reported | 0.89× | 1.49× | 15% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 2 | 2.6B CAD (≈$1.9B) | 99 | 73 | |
| 3 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 98 | 82 | |
| 4 | 14.5B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 5 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 97 | 84 | |
| 343 | 1.3B USD | 13 | 44 | |
| 344 | 425.1B JPY (≈$2.9B) | 13 | 44 | |
| 345 | 3.2B USD | 13 | 46 | |
| 346 | 1.4B USD | 13 | 38 | |
| 347 | 2.3B USD | 12 | 16 | |
| 348 | 10.9B SAR (≈$2.9B) | 12 | 46 | |
| 349 | 4.0B EUR (≈$4.4B) | 12 | 41 | |
| 350 | 2.9B USD | 12 | 28 | |
| 351 | 2.0B USD | 12 | 27 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score