Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PDM · against 246 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Ranked #213 of 247 · scores higher than 14% of peers · safety percentile 17
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)27 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including PDM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | PDM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 244 reported | 1.53× | 0.83× | 18% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 244 reported | 1.38 | 0.67 | 9% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 248 reported | 1.50× | 1.20× | 59% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.1B SGD (≈$864M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 2 | 1.1B SGD (≈$813M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 3 | 3.3B SAR (≈$901M) | 99 | 70 | |
| 4 | 6.3B CNY (≈$876M) | 98 | 50 | |
| 5 | 1.1B SGD (≈$828M) | 98 | 31 | |
| 209 | 1.2B AUD (≈$811M) | 18 | 47 | |
| 210 | 3.0B CAD (≈$2.2B) | 18 | 46 | |
| 211 | 655M USD | 17 | 23 | |
| 212 | 1.2B USD | 17 | 21 | |
| 213 | 1.2B USD | 17 | 29 | |
| 214 | 13.5B SEK (≈$1.3B) | 17 | 37 | |
| 215 | 2.2B EUR (≈$2.4B) | 16 | 32 | |
| 216 | 20.5B SEK (≈$2.0B) | 16 | 41 | |
| 217 | 1.7B USD | 16 | 8 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score